Free tool

Scheme slab designer.

Most slab schemes fail at the edges: the jump to the next slab is either too weak to change ordering, or so rich it invites bill-pooling. Enter your slabs and payouts — this tool computes the marginal rate at every edge, flags the risky ones, and prices the scheme per 1,000 counters.

Your scheme

Today's baseline — the behaviour you want to stretch.
Where you want the average counter to land.
SLAB 1
Threshold (₹)
Payout (% of purchase)
SLAB 2
Threshold (₹)
Payout (% of purchase)
SLAB 3
Threshold (₹)
Payout (% of purchase)
Payout is retroactive: a counter finishing in slab 2 earns slab 2's % on its full purchase — the standard Indian trade-scheme construct.
Below slab 1
Finish in slab 1
Finish in slab 2
Finish in slab 3
Cost model assumes counters that finish in a slab purchase at that slab's threshold (conservative), and counters below slab 1 purchase at your baseline average and earn nothing. Real distributions skew slightly above thresholds — counters stretch to clear the edge, which is exactly the behaviour you are paying for.
Scheme cost / 1,000 counters / month
Cost as % of purchases
Counters earning (of 1,000)
Avg payout / earning counter
The math

Slab math, and how counters game it.

Counters respond to the marginal rate, not the headline %

A "1.2% payout at ₹2.5L" headline hides the number that actually drives ordering: what does the counter earn on the extra purchase needed to get there? That is the marginal rate — (payout at slab N − payout at slab N−1) ÷ (threshold N − threshold N−1). In the pre-filled example, moving from slab 1 (₹1,200 on ₹1.5L) to slab 2 (₹3,000 on ₹2.5L) pays ₹1,800 on ₹1L of extra purchase — a 1.8% marginal rate. A counter compares that 1.8% against its cost of capital, godown space and the risk of unsold stock.

The 2–6% band

Across Indian trade schemes, marginal rates below ~2% rarely shift orders — the stretch isn't worth the working capital. Above ~6%, the edge becomes an arbitrage: crossing the threshold pays better than the counter's own trade margin on the incremental stock, so counters manufacture the crossing rather than sell their way to it.

How schemes get gamed

Bill-pooling — three counters route purchases through one to cross slab 3, then split the payout; the brand pays top-slab rates for zero incremental sale. Quarter-end loading — distributors dump stock into billing at period close to clear slabs, and next period's sales crater. Threshold parking — counters that can't reach the next edge stop buying once a slab is secured. Mitigations: QR-verified secondary offtake instead of primary billing, per-counter purchase caps, monthly rather than quarterly slabs, and outlier detection on sudden purchase spikes.

TDS 194R note

Slab payouts are benefits to channel partners: once a counter's rewards cross ₹20,000 in a financial year, Section 194R requires 10% TDS. At the pre-filled slab 3 (₹6,000/month), a counter crosses the limit in 4 months. Collect PAN at enrolment, decide whether payouts are grossed-up or net of TDS, and say so in the scheme T&C — retrofitting tax treatment mid-scheme destroys trade trust.

Want these slabs live in a sandbox?

Unotag configures slab schemes, QR-verified earning and instant UPI payouts mirrored to your channel within 48 hours — with fraud rules that keep the edges honest.

Next steps

Go deeper before you announce the scheme.